Weather conditions were pretty benign today, both in terms of wind speed and direction and in terms of the temperature, which, after an overcast night, was high enough (just) to prevent ice from forming on the mist net poles. There was even a small hatch of Chironomid midges in the neighbouring sewage works, only a few hundred or so but enough to keep the wintering Chiffchaffs distracted. Numbers were about average for the time of year with 39 birds trapped: 5 Blackbird, 2 Blue Tit, 2 Cetti’s Warbler, 19 Chiffchaff, 3 Goldcrest, 1 Great Tit, 1 Long-tailed Tit, 1 Reed Bunting and 5 Wren.
Way back in the year 3 b.p. (before pandemic!) Natural England sent me a document detailing their conservation objectives for South Milton Ley SSSI and tucked away in the comments section was a reference to a South West Water, AMP 4 investigation. This document proved to be of critical importance as it states that 90% of the phosphorus loading into the SSSI comes from the outflow of the adjacent sewage treatment works and just 10% from the catchment. I realised that, in order to arrive at the 90% figure, there must be some data on the actual levels of phosphorus reaching the Reserve from both sources.
Attempts to track down a copy were initially fruitless but, after a bit of detective work and with assistance from the Environment Agency, I identified the full title of the study as “South Milton Ley Habitats Investigations: Nutrient Investigations”, conducted by Faber Maunsell in 2006. Armed with this information I submitted a request for a copy to South West Water last month under the Environmental Information Regulations (2004). Their response, although timely, was disappointing, “Unfortunately, SWW have been unable to locate either a hard copy or electronic copy of the 2007 document”.
Not one to take “no” for an answer, I submitted a second request stating that I did not believe that SWW would not retain the results of a study they had commissioned and, in its absence, asking for any data they had on nutrient levels reaching the SSSI from the catchment. This seems to have galvanised them into action and miraculously, I have just received a copy of the 132-page report together with nutrient data from 2006 up to 27th August 2021. Result!!
The 2006 study was comprehensive and included examination of sediment cores from several sites in the lower Ley. One of the parameters studied was the number and diversity of the benthic diatom flora. Having spent many hours identifying and counting phytoplankton in marine and benthic samples during my career as a marine microbiologist, I know what a labour of love these analyses must have been and am thankful that someone else did the work! Consequently, I have just been able to add 112 species to the lists for the reserve. These can be found in the South Milton Ley Species Lists section of the blog. Unfortunately, I have not been able to work out how to put in shortcuts to the relevant sections yet, so readers will have to scroll down through the lists until I unravel the complexities of the WordPress editor.
A steady morning’s ringing with enough gaps to enable me to complete a few more non-urgent maintenance tasks without any great pressure. Normally, by this time of year, the trees at South Milton have just about finished shedding their leaves but the continuing mild weather and the lack of wind-blown salt spray has left many of the Willows hanging on to theirs. Once all the leaves have fallen, the margins of the sewage works become the focus of attention but, at present, birds are spread thinly throughout the ringing area. There was a welcome sign that wintering numbers are beginning to build with four Goldcrest and seventeen Chiffchaff amongst the total.
I uncovered a heavy, rubber, fencing support block some time ago, which was buried in the undergrowth and might have been there since the sewage works was constructed many moons ago. It’s now sitting under the reedbed end of my bridge to Marsh Ride, hopefully raising it clear of future floods in the stream and further reducing the risk of it being swept downstream again.
I have also been nurturing a selection of Rowan, Hawthorn and Bird Cherry saplings at home as an insurance policy in the case of widespread Ash dieback. A number of young Ash trees are now showing clear signs of disease so I planted twelve of my saplings to replace them. Hopefully, all three species will prove attractive to passage thrushes in the future and maybe even the occasional Waxwing!
38 birds were trapped: 6 Blackbird, 3 Blue Tit, 2 Cetti’s Warbler, 17 Chiffchaff, 1 Dunnock, 4 Goldcrest, 2 Great Tit, 1 Robin 1 Song Thrush and 1 Wren.
A light frost, the first of the autumn, greeted me when I arrived at the Reserve this morning but, as the day wore on, I found myself peeling off layers of clothing in brilliant sunshine with almost no breeze. Perfect conditions for the nets, if a little bright. The birds weren’t cooperating though. There was little sign of overhead passage, just a few hundred Woodpigeon and a couple of Redwing and Mistle Thrush and not much on the ground either. In the end, just 23 birds were trapped in five hours and half of these were re-traps. The final totals were: 1 Blackbird, 2 Blue Tit, 3 Cetti’s Warbler, 4 Chiffchaff, 2 Dunnock, 3 Goldcrest, 3 Great Tit, 3 Robin and 2 Wren.
However, with no pressure from the nets, I was able to complete a number of minor maintenance tasks, which had been accumulating. The first job was to replace the snapped mist net pole in Blaca ride. I had measured its diameter on my last visit and made up a sleeve at home to cover the break. Tightening a couple of self-tappers fixed it in about five minutes. A good start.
After the wet latter half of October with 60% more rain than average, South Milton Stream was pretty full and the water table had clearly risen in the reedbed. The stream was lapping around the base of my bridge to Marsh ride. It has been swept off its mountings a couple of times before so I hammered in two scaffolding poles to stop it drifting downstream in the future. Marsh ride is the lowest point in that part of the reedbed. Years of walking up and down the net ride have created a channel, probably only 10-20cm lower than the surrounding marsh but enough to show up as prone to flooding on Environment Agency maps.
Whilst on the subject of flooding. The northern boundary path, in the region of the boardwalk, is regularly inundated when the coastal sandbar is high and the reserve manager was concerned that the cessation of dredging in South Milton Stream would exacerbate the problem. Today gave me the perfect opportunity to take some photos and measure the current depth of the channel. About an additional 20cm of sediment has accumulated since my last measurement but the boardwalk area remained accessible, confirming mine and Nick’s assessment that it is water impounded behind the sandbar rather than the stream that causes the flooding. The chart above shows the amount of sediment accumulated since the last dredging operation in 2014.
The water levels in South Milton Stream, between the sewage works and the boardwalk, lapped between 10 and 30cm below the banks and it now has a much more natural appearance when compared to the 2m deep, steep-sided channel left after previous ditching operations. There is no doubt that this will raise the water table leading to a healthier reedbed and, as an added bonus, at no cost to Devon Birds or the ecology of this part of the reserve. It’s still early days but, at the present rate of sedimentation, my hope is that the stream will eventually look like this in the height of summer, albeit with much lower flows. The images below, travelling downstream from the public footpath towards the boardwalk, show the gradual raising of the water table and the transition from almost no reeds to a much denser stand of almost pure reed.
As ever, Nick Townsend has been the voice of reason and acting as mediator between myself and the South Milton Ley Reserve manager. My sense of frustration has reached the point where I no longer see any future in continuing a dialogue. The feedback I have received is limited and no explanation has been offered as to why the Water Vole habitat was destroyed. Apparently, there were no signs of Water Vole in the area at the time! Not surprising when you consider that in the eleven years since they were reintroduced at South Huish Reserve or the six years since they were first reliably reported at SML the manager has consistently failed to secure any hard evidence of their presence at either site. Maybe his skillset is more limited than he realises as the experts from Devon Biodiversity Records Centre identified signs of burrows, latrines and feeding at 14 locations at South Huish and a further 13 locations at SML. All in one day!
The left-hand photo above shows the results of the 2021 water Vole survey at South Milton Ley (red dots) and the four brown areas in the right-hand, aerial photo the margins strimmed down to bare earth. A depressingly close match in my opinion. All very confusing when the agreed plan for the vegetation at Horswell Ditch was to encourage Sedge and Cetti’s Warblers to breed in the margins. Maybe my ecological knowledge is out of date and both species actually prefer short-mown turf!
My original inclination had been to report the incident to the Devon and Cornwall Police Wildlife Crimes Group but, having calmed down and, in the absence of anyone currently willing or able to take on the manager’s role, and also being reluctant to jeopardise my ringing activities by antagonising Devon Bird’s Council, I have agreed to include a comprehensive ditch management protocol, incorporating all the legal and best practice requirements relating to Water Voles, in the draft 2021-2026 management pan for the site. My suggestion to Devon Bird’s Council is that they should consider making it a requirement that reserve managers must consult with their local Conservation Officer before commencing any operation not already covered in an existing management plan.